Gulp. A KPMG survey of 134 companies worldwide found that 56 per cent have had to write off as a failure at least one IT project in the past year. The average loss incurreed: 12.5 million euros. Sixty-seven per cent reckoned that their project management function was in need of improvement. A principal reason for failure: poor communication.
(From The Register)
Tuesday, November 26, 2002
Tuesday, November 19, 2002
BBC still by far the most popular UK news website
Latest Nielsen NetRatings stats for online news sites here. In October the BBC copped 2.8 million unique viewers; the Guardian 1.3 million, CNN 0.65 million; Ananova 0.5 million; the Telegraph 0.48 million; the FT 0.47 million, and the Sun 0.46 million. The BBC has by far the longest average time per month at 55 minutes.
El Pais now a paid site
El Pais began charging for most of its content Monday November 19. There are two payment options: an annual fee of €80 or a biannual fee of €50. There is also a micropayment option of 0.5 euros for a PDF or 0.2 euros for an html article.
(From E-Media Tidbits)
(From E-Media Tidbits)
Tuesday, November 12, 2002
Clarín produces electronic edition
The Argentinian daily Clarín is running a free digital edition using the facsimile page pane, HTML-optimised story pane model. It's pretty impressive, and includes an "other stories" list at the end of each story, No PDFs so far as I can see. See also discussion on Metafilter.
(From Metafilter)
(From Metafilter)
Sunday, November 10, 2002
FT, Slate doing trials with tablet PC
The Financial Times, Forbes, the New Yorker, Slate, Les Echoes and Wirtschafts Woche have signed deals with Microsoft to develop tools to publish trial tablet PC magazines. They are hoping to have something usable some time in 2003. Despite the limited take-up of ebooks, the publishers hope to appeal to advertisers for similar reasons: the familiarity and acceptance of print display ads plus the interactivity and personalisation opportunities of electronic publishing. Meanwhile digital edition software company has announced a reader application for tablet PC.
(From CNet News.Com)
(From CNet News.Com)
Friday, November 08, 2002
When good interfaces go crufty
Interesting essay on "cruft" -- interface conventions that harken back to redundant necessities -- by one Matthew Thomas on his weblog, plus some discussion on Slashdot. Lots of nods to Isys Information Architect's Interface Hall of Shame, home of our favourite Lotus Notes review.
(From Slashdot)
(From Slashdot)
Thursday, November 07, 2002
Link farm front pages need to consider Google page design
I've got to agree with Steve Outing on this. News websites just haven't learnt enough from print or TV as regards what to do with their front pages. The headlines before a news programme, or the items on a broadsheet newspaper front page, will rarely stretch beyond 10 items (generic indexes excluded). Even with all the other furniture counted on a newspaper front page, you'll never be taken in more than about 20 different directions. Same goes for Google. Compare that to the Washington Post: 217 links on its front page. Does anyone really scroll down on front pages? I'm not against bundling stories in drop-down menus and leaving the very best editorial picks on the front. Show the quality -- everyone knows there's quantity online.
(From Editor & Publisher)
(From Editor & Publisher)
Tuesday, October 29, 2002
Reuters sued for publishing public URL
Here's an odd one. Swedish tech firm Intentia International has filed a suit against Reuters for obtaining an earnings report for the company from a web page that Intentia considered private on the grounds that no public navigation directed vistors to the page. The URL, however, was completely open to the world inasmuch as no registration is required to access it -- simply knowledge of the URL. Intentia reckon this means hacking and argue that a ruling against them would set the precedent that anything on an open web server is public information. Tautology?
(From Salon)
(From Salon)
Pfeiffer on EidosMedia
Industry pundit Andreas Pfeiffer considers Xsmile, the XML-based pagination component of EidosMedia's Méthode publishing system, and reckons that such systems "could prefigure what standards driven workflow solutions of the future could look like". I did a review of Méthode for GNL IT - colleagues can read this in the "IT Library" or whatever it's called. The main problem with the ideal of a natively XML based solution is that in a medium as mature as print, in many design-driven workflows it is simply unrealistic to draw a line between form and content. The fact that XML and even SVG isn't really rich enough to describe a multi-layered InDesign page using sophisticated transparency isn't a failing -- it's to be expected.
(From Pfeiffer Report)
(From Pfeiffer Report)
Monday, October 28, 2002
"91% of XPress users unhappy" -- Macworld
Macworld UK asked 1,268 readers if they were considering an alternative to QuarkXPress or have already switched. Niney-one percent of them said they were unhappy with Quark. Fifty-one percent said they were sick of waiting for a OS X version of the software, and 40 per cent said they had already switched to Adobe InDesign. Nine per cent declared that they would rather use XPress under any circumstances.
(From Macworld UK)
(From Macworld UK)
Wednesday, October 23, 2002
Washington Post 'was forced to sell IHT stake to NYT'
Washington Post CEO told Post editors that the New York Times threatened to drive the International Herald Tribune to ruin unless the Post sold its stake to the Times, according to Editor & Publisher. Apparently the Times threatened to start its own international edition and to block investment into the IHT. The Times has not commented.
(From Editor & Publisher)
(From Editor & Publisher)
Europe leads on cross-media publishing
Review of the Ifra show from Editor and Publisher. Argues that European developers are showing the way for new cross-media publishing solutions. "No less than five Spanish companies -- Ailink, Protec, Quasar, SchlumbergerSema, and Seinet -- will compete with northern Europe's established giants and their equally attractive Italian counterparts to court the world's newspapers." Media tech consultant Bill Rosenblatt, who recognises that American publishers are far more conservative than Europeans when it comes to news tech investment, observes also that European vendors "have the better technologies".
(From Editor & Publisher)
(From Editor & Publisher)
Monday, October 14, 2002
Quark gets SOAPy
Quark has upgraded its Digital Media System to improve access to, and administration of, assets within the system. Also added to DMS is a "Web Site Manager" and a SOAP framework, indicating that Fred Ebrahimi has jumped on the web services bandwagon; "WebCopyDesk", which is fairly self-explanatory; CRM tools; some workflow automation tools; and finally the "QuarkDMS Workflow Engine". This is described by Macword as as allowing publishers to "design and execute workflow processes, track projects, and define custom graphical workflow templates to control how work flows between people throughout the enterprise. This solution includes prioritization, editing, scheduling and production-orientated tasks."
(From Macworld UK)
(From Macworld UK)
Friday, October 11, 2002
German ABC to count digital editions
Katja Riefler notes on E-Media Tidbits that IVW, the German equivalent of the Audit Bureau of Circulation, is likely to decide to recognise some newspaper digital editions as paid circulation. The proposed model is such that digital circulation will be counted as a distinct figure to print circulation rather than a component of it.
(From E-Media Tidbits)
(From E-Media Tidbits)
Thursday, October 10, 2002
Pfeiffer on XPress X
Andreas Pfeiffer on the forthcoming timing showdown between Apple machines booting in OSX only (Jan 2003) and Quark's forthcoming X-only release of XPress (probably Q2 2003). He notes that businesses would prefer to migrate OS and application environments at different times, but they may well be forced to change both at the same time. The article is pretty much verbatim what he argued in his recent eWeek report, albeit more management summary. Conclusion: what people really want is an XPress 4.x that runs both in OS9 and OSX -- so they have control over their upgrade migration.
(From Pfeiffer Reports)
(From Pfeiffer Reports)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)