Will787, the main contributor to the Guardian talkboard discussion on digital editions, has a followup to his earlier piece (see below) about digital editions in the UK. Again he's nice about us: "The Guardian's 'digital edition' is effective value". He also cites us as a working (at least in broadband) example of Adobe's vaunted "network publishing". Will787 comments that print media seems to be rather quiet about digital media.
(From OhmyNews)
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
Monday, August 30, 2004
Explanation for the new template
Technical shortcomings on my part. I messed up the comments feature and ended up in so much trouble it was easier to adopt a pro forma Blogger jobbie.
Having done that I see that the archive cell is appearing in the wrong place, so this new template has its own problems. Ho hum.
Having done that I see that the archive cell is appearing in the wrong place, so this new template has its own problems. Ho hum.
Saturday, August 28, 2004
Digital edition success? Depends on what you mean
Good comment by Vin Crosbie in response to CyberJournalist concluding that recent circulation figures for "digital editions" prove them "destined to failure". Crosbie says that yes, retailed downloadable digital editions will fail - but only until the technology at the consumer end brings the medium to life. Meanwhile newspaper digital edition websites (such as ours) fare slightly better, and digital editions of B2B magazines can indeed be highly successful. Furthermore, print "digital editions" using vendors such as NewspapersDirect have been a useful and profitable addition to the roster.
(From Digital Deliverance)
(From Digital Deliverance)
Tuesday, August 17, 2004
Seybold report on editorial planning
Or what they call budgeting in the US. Haven't read it yet, apart from a bit about the CCI NewsGate install at the Tampa Tribune.
(From Seybold Reports
(From Seybold Reports
Friday, August 13, 2004
Correct your magazine article - in the digital edition
PC Mag sent out a digital edition containing a correction to a story that appeared in the original. So should a diged present itself as being of the electronic media ilk (i.e. ever-live) or should it be a true repesentation of the printed product? I prefer the "see the correction" model I think.
(From E-Media Tidbits)
(From E-Media Tidbits)
Monday, August 09, 2004
QuarkXPress 7.0 will be "InDesign-like"
According to AppleInsider's sources, QuarkXPress version 7 -- currently touted for release in early 2005 -- will feature "a 'very InDesign-like interface' and a completely rewritten PDF engine".
(From AppleInsider)
(From AppleInsider)
Tuesday, August 03, 2004
We're a niche publisher
Columnist weblogs announced. Computer games goes live Monday.
(From NMA To Go)
(From NMA To Go)
Safe from Harm
An "I was looking back to see if you were looking back at me..." moment, with, following the Guardian's recent OhMyNews extravaganza, an article in OhMyNews about the Guardian (albeit from an Enlgish writer). Sometimes cutting. A quote: "So far as I know [Peter Preston's recent epiphanic web article in the Obs] is the first statement on paper in the Guardian or Observer that informs a reader about the digital editions."
(From OhmyNews International)
(From OhmyNews International)
Twelve sources account for majority of stories on Google News
Despite evidence to the contrrary (albeit now a year old) from my Googlescraper, research by Digital Deliverance shows no Guardian Unlimited in the top ten sources on Google News. Darn! Their table shows (with statistical rounding):
Reuters 175 stories 18% of all
New York Times 80 stories 8% of all
Voice of America 67 stories 7% of all
Xinhua 67 stories 7% of all
Bloomberg 61 stories 6% of all
Washington Post 61 stories 6% of all
ABC News 49 stories 5% of all
Boston Globe 26 stories 2% of all
CNN 22 stories 2% of all
San Francisco Chronicle 17 stories 1% of all
CNN International 17 stories 1% of all
Christian Science Monitor 15 stories 1% of all
Toronto Star 13 stories 1% of all
Seattle Post Intelligencer 13 stories 1% of all
United Press International 12 stories 1% of all
USA Today 10 stories 1% of all
Houston Chronicle 10 stories 1% of all
FOX News 10 stories 1% of all
Newsday 10 stories 1% of all
The Globe and Mail 9 stories 0% of all.
Read Vin's article and associated comments for more on this.
(From Digital Deliverance)
Reuters 175 stories 18% of all
New York Times 80 stories 8% of all
Voice of America 67 stories 7% of all
Xinhua 67 stories 7% of all
Bloomberg 61 stories 6% of all
Washington Post 61 stories 6% of all
ABC News 49 stories 5% of all
Boston Globe 26 stories 2% of all
CNN 22 stories 2% of all
San Francisco Chronicle 17 stories 1% of all
CNN International 17 stories 1% of all
Christian Science Monitor 15 stories 1% of all
Toronto Star 13 stories 1% of all
Seattle Post Intelligencer 13 stories 1% of all
United Press International 12 stories 1% of all
USA Today 10 stories 1% of all
Houston Chronicle 10 stories 1% of all
FOX News 10 stories 1% of all
Newsday 10 stories 1% of all
The Globe and Mail 9 stories 0% of all.
Read Vin's article and associated comments for more on this.
(From Digital Deliverance)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)